Since Charlie Kirk's assassination on September 10, 2025, by a radical leftist sniper, MAGA violence? Zilch. A pathetic nothingburger—zero riots, arsons, or dead Dems from the right. Meanwhile, the left's blood-soaked rampage (BLM infernos, Antifa beatdowns, and endless "mostly peaceful" chaos) drowns it all out like a tsunami over a puddle. The difference between left and right violence isn’t even close. The left is so stupid. They think they killed a right-wing homophobe who spewed hate. The reality couldn’t be further from the truth. Charlie Kirk was a moderate and didn’t have one ounce os hate in his body for anyone. If you brain-dead sociopaths would sit down and listen to hours of his videos, you would very quickly find out what level of sociopath you really are.
Settle down, Sparky. When you use words and terminology please define it: left's blood soaked, endless chaos, moderate, and almost the entire post. If you do not define terms you think that everyone has the same definition and they do not. So, I really have no idea of what you mean, only what you say. Can you give an example or evidence or even an analogy for your conclusions?
So Charlie Kirk had the right to make as many bigoted comments as he wanted, because it's freedom of speech, but people protesting the genocide of Palestinians are labelled hateful and terrorist supporters. Got it. We've officially entered The Twilight Zone, folks.
I can't believe it's been 29 years since Tupac passed away. I was 17 and on holiday in Florida at the time. Man, that was a sad day. R.I.P.
I do agree with you and this is part of the fascist playbook - dehumanize the "other." Charlie certainly had agency and status as a white man- but i did see a crack in his speech as a couple of days before he was killed he did say, with hesitation, that Israel's hard right gov wants to ethnically cleanse Gaza - perhaps,had he lived, he might have evolved from a bigot to a humanitarian. It's possible
Yes, I do believe he started to question things. It could be the reason why he was silenced. Perhaps he would have changed; he was young and had his whole life ahead of him. People can and do change through the course of life. Sadly, we will never know.
This is the most insulting thing I've ever seen. I take it the author is one of the people who celebrated his death. Here's an idea, how about you talk to people on the other side of the aisle and discuss what can we do to prevent any further violence. I wish this was an option. But that is all that Charlie wanted to do, talk about it. And he was shot in the throat for it. I(maga) will not rest until this evil plague is erased from America. We need to open insane asylums back up and put the people who celebrated this in there
The left's hypocrisy is vile, constantly accusing the right of the very tactics they shamelessly use every time they cry "injustice." Their rap sheet of violent outbursts is long and utterly deplorable. They even use examples of events like Shapiro and say it was a right-winger when it was another lunatic lefty shithead. The Minnesota shooting is also likely a lefty shithead with ties to Walz. But who knows the truth about that one because all we get fed by the left-wing media is lies after lies and omission of key facts and details of things that don’t fit the narrative.
No, CBS and FOX are owned by transnational corporations not the left wing'. So again: What does it mean to be a 'left wing media'? or better yet, what do you mean by 'left wing' for what you state is hardly 'left wing' media. Maybe you are mixing up 'liberals' with 'left wingers'
Trump’s foreign policy is a goulash of contradictory action - EXCEPT for a fact that he is a Zionist dedicated to creation of ever-greater Israel — a MIGA fraud
-------------------------------------------
Steve Witkoff is publicly despairing that Trump did not receive Nobel Peace Prize for “resolving six+ wars” yet… In meantime, US GG ~~700,000 dead so far – mostly (71%) children.
Once US Christian Zionist lunatics (a sect), that is, non-Christian criminals in charge of “feeding” 2M+ Gazans, once they sufficiently starve them – desperate survivors would “willingly” move to Antarctica
The minute Charlie got hit, the narrative machine was launched: problem-solution, state censorship from the Free Speech side now. It doesn’t feel organic. Cui Bono? https://substack.com/@nemopix/note/c-156556377
If you ask me that's a call for radicalization and recipe for even more polarized society, if not civil war... (Church and MAGA are playing the same game, directed by from the same source of manipulation! Looks like someone REALLY wants civil war in the US. And Redacted are not really independent. What a mess!)
Aaron and Katie - respectfully, the whole notion that we can magically legislate out of existence hundreds of millions of guns owned by Americans is both immature and delusional. And even if confine you belief to magically restricting the weapons confiscation to what the Left has called “assault weapons” - that would not have stopped the Kirk assassination. The assassination was done with a common hunting rifle - you know, the guns the Democrats constantly tell us they are not coming for. So, I think you are presenting a supposed legislative solution that is irrelevant to preventing last week’s violence and a both a realistic and political non-starter.
They're absolute morons. Listening to these brain-dead progressive clowns is almost laughable. Free speech is vital precisely because we need to hear the deranged drivel from these liberal idiots.
Charlie hated free speech. He loved to weaponize speech. Hiding behind free speech was David Horowitz's idea, the former leftist radical now in his late eighties who went fascist and helped to tutor young Charlie.
You must be a fucking complete moron to believe one shred of the info in the article you posted. Why don’t you STFU already and spend a weekend listening to Charlie Kirk unedited and from start to finish? Then maybe you can wake the fuck up and realize Charlie Kirk was one of the good guys. Did the billionaire class fund him? Sure, they did. Just like the billionaire class of George Soros, Klaus Schwab, and countless other fucktard billionaires fund you anarchist lefty dipshits in the left. Just because Kirk took money doesn’t mean he was someone spreading hate.
I do like to sleep well at night, Katie and Aaron, thank you. I’d rather have them punish Netanyahu than Putin. Why don’t they do that? Look at how Europe and US are going to punish Iran with the snap-back sanctions. We can kill 500,000kids in Iraq through sanctions as Madeline Albright said. He was too demented to make a decision.
Anyone, such as CK, advocating for harm done to anyone, no matter how subtly, is a tacit killer, and not worthy of sympathy from anyone surviving them.
Who is this Ms Harper you speak of? The host's name is Katie Halper. Of course, you would know that if you'd actually watched the show, but you're only here to waste time posting unoriginal and unfunny insults. Toodles 👋🏻
I have respected both of you, but this is so tone deaf. What little I had been exposed to of Charlie Kirk, I admired because he engaged in respectful dialogue & debate. Yes, there are many on the right who do not do that, including our Commander in chief, but the left needs to elevate their narrative if they are going to pretend they are the lesser of two evils. Why? Here is one example of why ... you are competing with this young gay black male who was influenced by Charlie Kirk. I would love to see you both seriously and respectfully engage him without cynical cackling humor. https://youtu.be/N14ywRyTWVI?si=SLs1_q1URjjTk4ba
There hasn't been ANY violence from Maga. What are you talking about?
Since Charlie Kirk's assassination on September 10, 2025, by a radical leftist sniper, MAGA violence? Zilch. A pathetic nothingburger—zero riots, arsons, or dead Dems from the right. Meanwhile, the left's blood-soaked rampage (BLM infernos, Antifa beatdowns, and endless "mostly peaceful" chaos) drowns it all out like a tsunami over a puddle. The difference between left and right violence isn’t even close. The left is so stupid. They think they killed a right-wing homophobe who spewed hate. The reality couldn’t be further from the truth. Charlie Kirk was a moderate and didn’t have one ounce os hate in his body for anyone. If you brain-dead sociopaths would sit down and listen to hours of his videos, you would very quickly find out what level of sociopath you really are.
Settle down, Sparky. When you use words and terminology please define it: left's blood soaked, endless chaos, moderate, and almost the entire post. If you do not define terms you think that everyone has the same definition and they do not. So, I really have no idea of what you mean, only what you say. Can you give an example or evidence or even an analogy for your conclusions?
So Charlie Kirk had the right to make as many bigoted comments as he wanted, because it's freedom of speech, but people protesting the genocide of Palestinians are labelled hateful and terrorist supporters. Got it. We've officially entered The Twilight Zone, folks.
I can't believe it's been 29 years since Tupac passed away. I was 17 and on holiday in Florida at the time. Man, that was a sad day. R.I.P.
Thanks, guys. Always a pleasure watching UI.
Provide one video, not a sound bite, where Charlie Kirk made a bigoted comment.
https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2018/02/02/18806453.php
https://kpfa.org/episode/workweek-february-13-2018/
I do agree with you and this is part of the fascist playbook - dehumanize the "other." Charlie certainly had agency and status as a white man- but i did see a crack in his speech as a couple of days before he was killed he did say, with hesitation, that Israel's hard right gov wants to ethnically cleanse Gaza - perhaps,had he lived, he might have evolved from a bigot to a humanitarian. It's possible
Yes, I do believe he started to question things. It could be the reason why he was silenced. Perhaps he would have changed; he was young and had his whole life ahead of him. People can and do change through the course of life. Sadly, we will never know.
Go burn down more cities for BLM.
Oh, Jason, calm down, you silly bean. Nobody is burning anything down for BLM. Stop inciting violence and take a time-out in the corner, young man.
This is the most insulting thing I've ever seen. I take it the author is one of the people who celebrated his death. Here's an idea, how about you talk to people on the other side of the aisle and discuss what can we do to prevent any further violence. I wish this was an option. But that is all that Charlie wanted to do, talk about it. And he was shot in the throat for it. I(maga) will not rest until this evil plague is erased from America. We need to open insane asylums back up and put the people who celebrated this in there
The left's hypocrisy is vile, constantly accusing the right of the very tactics they shamelessly use every time they cry "injustice." Their rap sheet of violent outbursts is long and utterly deplorable. They even use examples of events like Shapiro and say it was a right-winger when it was another lunatic lefty shithead. The Minnesota shooting is also likely a lefty shithead with ties to Walz. But who knows the truth about that one because all we get fed by the left-wing media is lies after lies and omission of key facts and details of things that don’t fit the narrative.
What does it mean to be a 'left wing media'?
The propaganda from CBS to Fox and everything in between. There is almost no true journalism left today. It’s all mostly propaganda and lies.
No, CBS and FOX are owned by transnational corporations not the left wing'. So again: What does it mean to be a 'left wing media'? or better yet, what do you mean by 'left wing' for what you state is hardly 'left wing' media. Maybe you are mixing up 'liberals' with 'left wingers'
Trump’s foreign policy is a goulash of contradictory action - EXCEPT for a fact that he is a Zionist dedicated to creation of ever-greater Israel — a MIGA fraud
-------------------------------------------
Steve Witkoff is publicly despairing that Trump did not receive Nobel Peace Prize for “resolving six+ wars” yet… In meantime, US GG ~~700,000 dead so far – mostly (71%) children.
Once US Christian Zionist lunatics (a sect), that is, non-Christian criminals in charge of “feeding” 2M+ Gazans, once they sufficiently starve them – desperate survivors would “willingly” move to Antarctica
My Bibi assassination denying tour cartoon: https://substack.com/profile/10367859-nemo/note/c-157374367
The minute Charlie got hit, the narrative machine was launched: problem-solution, state censorship from the Free Speech side now. It doesn’t feel organic. Cui Bono? https://substack.com/@nemopix/note/c-156556377
Listen to Father Calvin Robinson on Redacted, and you'll see that the claim in the title has something to it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUvmEW3yDas
If you ask me that's a call for radicalization and recipe for even more polarized society, if not civil war... (Church and MAGA are playing the same game, directed by from the same source of manipulation! Looks like someone REALLY wants civil war in the US. And Redacted are not really independent. What a mess!)
Aaron and Katie - respectfully, the whole notion that we can magically legislate out of existence hundreds of millions of guns owned by Americans is both immature and delusional. And even if confine you belief to magically restricting the weapons confiscation to what the Left has called “assault weapons” - that would not have stopped the Kirk assassination. The assassination was done with a common hunting rifle - you know, the guns the Democrats constantly tell us they are not coming for. So, I think you are presenting a supposed legislative solution that is irrelevant to preventing last week’s violence and a both a realistic and political non-starter.
They're absolute morons. Listening to these brain-dead progressive clowns is almost laughable. Free speech is vital precisely because we need to hear the deranged drivel from these liberal idiots.
Charlie hated free speech. He loved to weaponize speech. Hiding behind free speech was David Horowitz's idea, the former leftist radical now in his late eighties who went fascist and helped to tutor young Charlie.
https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2017/04/19/18798596.php
https://substack.com/@thatskaizen/note/c-156298691?r=6alom&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
You must be a fucking complete moron to believe one shred of the info in the article you posted. Why don’t you STFU already and spend a weekend listening to Charlie Kirk unedited and from start to finish? Then maybe you can wake the fuck up and realize Charlie Kirk was one of the good guys. Did the billionaire class fund him? Sure, they did. Just like the billionaire class of George Soros, Klaus Schwab, and countless other fucktard billionaires fund you anarchist lefty dipshits in the left. Just because Kirk took money doesn’t mean he was someone spreading hate.
I do like to sleep well at night, Katie and Aaron, thank you. I’d rather have them punish Netanyahu than Putin. Why don’t they do that? Look at how Europe and US are going to punish Iran with the snap-back sanctions. We can kill 500,000kids in Iraq through sanctions as Madeline Albright said. He was too demented to make a decision.
Anyone, such as CK, advocating for harm done to anyone, no matter how subtly, is a tacit killer, and not worthy of sympathy from anyone surviving them.
Some how gun violence is the problem LOL. There are plenty of ways to assassinate your political enemies. delusional people
Come on guys, do you really think the cause of American violence is the availability of guns?
Ms Harper asks to give her/the podcast a thumbs up. How can we give her a thumbs down or a middle finger up? By unsubscribing I assume.
Useless Idiots is a more appropriate label for this farcical pod.
Who is this Ms Harper you speak of? The host's name is Katie Halper. Of course, you would know that if you'd actually watched the show, but you're only here to waste time posting unoriginal and unfunny insults. Toodles 👋🏻
I have respected both of you, but this is so tone deaf. What little I had been exposed to of Charlie Kirk, I admired because he engaged in respectful dialogue & debate. Yes, there are many on the right who do not do that, including our Commander in chief, but the left needs to elevate their narrative if they are going to pretend they are the lesser of two evils. Why? Here is one example of why ... you are competing with this young gay black male who was influenced by Charlie Kirk. I would love to see you both seriously and respectfully engage him without cynical cackling humor. https://youtu.be/N14ywRyTWVI?si=SLs1_q1URjjTk4ba
When Lyndsey Graham sound more reasonable, more in touch with humanity, and less tone deaf then you, you have to take a hard look in the mirror.
So gross. 🤮