14 Comments
User's avatar
C.C. 95's avatar

There hasn't been ANY violence from Maga. What are you talking about?

Expand full comment
SF Bay Area's avatar

Since Charlie Kirk's assassination on September 10, 2025, by a radical leftist sniper, MAGA violence? Zilch. A pathetic nothingburger—zero riots, arsons, or dead Dems from the right. Meanwhile, the left's blood-soaked rampage (BLM infernos, Antifa beatdowns, and endless "mostly peaceful" chaos) drowns it all out like a tsunami over a puddle. The difference between left and right violence isn’t even close. The left is so stupid. They think they killed a right-wing homophobe who spewed hate. The reality couldn’t be further from the truth. Charlie Kirk was a moderate and didn’t have one ounce os hate in his body for anyone. If you brain-dead sociopaths would sit down and listen to hours of his videos, you would very quickly find out what level of sociopath you really are.

Expand full comment
Diane J's avatar

So Charlie Kirk had the right to make as many bigoted comments as he wanted, because it's freedom of speech, but people protesting the genocide of Palestinians are labelled hateful and terrorist supporters. Got it. We've officially entered The Twilight Zone, folks.

I can't believe it's been 29 years since Tupac passed away. I was 17 and on holiday in Florida at the time. Man, that was a sad day. R.I.P.

Thanks, guys. Always a pleasure watching UI.

Expand full comment
SF Bay Area's avatar

Provide one video, not a sound bite, where Charlie Kirk made a bigoted comment.

Expand full comment
shantiwater's avatar

I do agree with you and this is part of the fascist playbook - dehumanize the "other." Charlie certainly had agency and status as a white man- but i did see a crack in his speech as a couple of days before he was killed he did say, with hesitation, that Israel's hard right gov wants to ethnically cleanse Gaza - perhaps,had he lived, he might have evolved from a bigot to a humanitarian. It's possible

Expand full comment
Lance Nelson's avatar

This is the most insulting thing I've ever seen. I take it the author is one of the people who celebrated his death. Here's an idea, how about you talk to people on the other side of the aisle and discuss what can we do to prevent any further violence. I wish this was an option. But that is all that Charlie wanted to do, talk about it. And he was shot in the throat for it. I(maga) will not rest until this evil plague is erased from America. We need to open insane asylums back up and put the people who celebrated this in there

Expand full comment
SF Bay Area's avatar

The left's hypocrisy is vile, constantly accusing the right of the very tactics they shamelessly use every time they cry "injustice." Their rap sheet of violent outbursts is long and utterly deplorable. They even use examples of events like Shapiro and say it was a right-winger when it was another lunatic lefty shithead. The Minnesota shooting is also likely a lefty shithead with ties to Walz. But who knows the truth about that one because all we get fed by the left-wing media is lies after lies and omission of key facts and details of things that don’t fit the narrative.

Expand full comment
Jeremiah's avatar

Come on guys, do you really think the cause of American violence is the availability of guns?

Expand full comment
Nicholas Lyras's avatar

Ms Harper asks to give her/the podcast a thumbs up. How can we give her a thumbs down or a middle finger up? By unsubscribing I assume.

Useless Idiots is a more appropriate label for this farcical pod.

Expand full comment
INTELLECTUALLY CURIOUS's avatar

I have respected both of you, but this is so tone deaf. What little I had been exposed to of Charlie Kirk, I admired because he engaged in respectful dialogue & debate. Yes, there are many on the right who do not do that, including our Commander in chief, but the left needs to elevate their narrative if they are going to pretend they are the lesser of two evils. Why? Here is one example of why ... you are competing with this young gay black male who was influenced by Charlie Kirk. I would love to see you both seriously and respectfully engage him without cynical cackling humor. https://youtu.be/N14ywRyTWVI?si=SLs1_q1URjjTk4ba

Expand full comment
INTELLECTUALLY CURIOUS's avatar

When Lyndsey Graham sound more reasonable, more in touch with humanity, and less tone deaf then you, you have to take a hard look in the mirror.

Expand full comment
Angie English's avatar

So gross. 🤮

Expand full comment
Michael Marr's avatar

Aaron and Katie - respectfully, the whole notion that we can magically legislate out of existence hundreds of millions of guns owned by Americans is both immature and delusional. And even if confine you belief to magically restricting the weapons confiscation to what the Left has called “assault weapons” - that would not have stopped the Kirk assassination. The assassination was done with a common hunting rifle - you know, the guns the Democrats constantly tell us they are not coming for. So, I think you are presenting a supposed legislative solution that is irrelevant to preventing last week’s violence and a both a realistic and political non-starter.

Expand full comment
SF Bay Area's avatar

They're absolute morons. Listening to these brain-dead progressive clowns is almost laughable. Free speech is vital precisely because we need to hear the deranged drivel from these liberal idiots.

Expand full comment