Right. Matt has been strangely quiet on this, unless I missed the article. Greenwald on the other hand has his hair on fire, which is entirely justified. Disgusting abuse of power by the government.
I thought it was interesting that at one point Matt intentionally walked straight into the buzz saw of the trans discourse by bringing it up almost non sequitur. I groaned because I expected the convo to go there but I expected Joe to be the instigator. Honestly I think Joe was as surprised as I was.
On the other hand it’s a subject I find fascinating and I’m still not sure I understand the point Matt was trying to make. And I’ve read all of the controversial books and and the WPATH guidelines and the BARpod stuff. … but yeah I remember being more confused by Matt’s reference than anything. I’d love to know what he meant but also understand he probably would prefer not to elaborate.
Always love seeing Matt on JRE.
Matt did a great Rogan segment. Katie needs to go on JRE next!
Katie perhaps needs a bit preparation -- she often makes incorrect statements that later are corrected. This loses pace and time.
Surprised no mention of Julian Assange, as if he already doesn't exist...
Right. Matt has been strangely quiet on this, unless I missed the article. Greenwald on the other hand has his hair on fire, which is entirely justified. Disgusting abuse of power by the government.
oh man, that's a bummer, would have been a good platform to educate a lot of people about a disgusting injustice
I thought it was interesting that at one point Matt intentionally walked straight into the buzz saw of the trans discourse by bringing it up almost non sequitur. I groaned because I expected the convo to go there but I expected Joe to be the instigator. Honestly I think Joe was as surprised as I was.
On the other hand it’s a subject I find fascinating and I’m still not sure I understand the point Matt was trying to make. And I’ve read all of the controversial books and and the WPATH guidelines and the BARpod stuff. … but yeah I remember being more confused by Matt’s reference than anything. I’d love to know what he meant but also understand he probably would prefer not to elaborate.